Depolarization Studies
Interactive explorations for moving from radicalized extremes back to zones of compatibility where creative problem solving is possible.
Interactive explorations for moving from radicalized extremes back to zones of compatibility where creative problem solving is possible.
Mental models that counteract polarized thinking
A toolkit of mental models designed to counteract the cognitive biases that fuel polarization. Learn frameworks to help you engage constructively across divides, recognize complexity, and resist black-and-white thinking.
Key Questions:
How conversation structure affects polarization dynamics
Explore how dialogue differs from debate in its depolarizing effects. Understand the specific conversational patterns that either amplify or reduce polarization, and learn how genuine listening disrupts the cognitive mechanisms that drive us to extremes.
Key Questions:
Distinguishing productive friction from destructive division
An interactive simulation that clarifies the crucial difference between healthy disagreement and destructive polarization. Explore how viewpoint diversity can lead to truth-seeking, while polarization collapses nuance and undermines it.
Key Questions:
When disagreement helps truth-seeking
Interactive simulations exploring how polarization dynamics affect collective decision-making, truth discovery, and innovation. Discover when diversity of opinion strengthens rather than weakens group intelligence.
Key Questions:
How rational choices can lead to collective division
An analysis of how polarization can emerge as an unintended consequence of individuals making rational decisions. This module explores how social incentives for conformity and coordination can collectively lead a society into deep, stable division.
Key Questions:
Changing the rules to reward cooperation and unity
If polarization is a game, depolarization requires changing the rules. This module explores game-theoretic strategies that alter the incentives to make cooperation, moderation, and bridge-building more attractive than division.
Key Questions:
The neurological roots of "us vs. them"
A deep dive into the neuroscience of how our brains process identity, threat, and belonging. Understand how ancient neural circuits are hijacked in modern polarized environments and how that affects our capacity for nuance and wisdom.
Key Questions:
Identifying and overcoming your own polarized thinking
An inward turn to recognize the personal habits and cognitive patterns that contribute to and perpetuate polarization. Learn to detect the signals of your own polarized mind, such as extreme language, lack of nuance, and motive attribution.
Key Questions:
How algorithms and media incentives fuel division
An analysis of how the design of algorithmic recommendation systems and media platforms creates incentives that drive affective polarization. Learn to identify the specific mechanisms of algorithmic amplification and advocate for depolarizing design alternatives.
Key Questions:
How social structures create and reinforce division
Explore how social network structures causally lead to group polarization and the formation of echo chambers. This simulation-based module demonstrates how information propagates differently in fragmented vs. integrated networks.
Key Questions: